Contracts · MBE-tested
Willie R. Gemwright et al., Appellants, v. Robert L. Terry et al., Respondents
199 A.D.2d 464608 N.Y.S.2d 104·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1993·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Willie R. Gemwright et al., Appellants, v Robert L. Terry et al., Respondents.
[608 NYS2d 104]
[MAJORITY]
In an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens Court (Lerner, J.), entered October 16, 1991, which, upon granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, made at the close of evidence, is in favor of the defendants and against them.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs-purchasers failed to demonstrate that they were ready, willing, and able to close within a reasonable period of time of the date specified in the parties’ contract (see, 3M Holding Corp. v Wagner, 166 AD2d 580; Xhelili v Larstanna, 150 AD2d 560). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Miller and Santucci, JJ., concur.