Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Nevin, Surviving Executor, et al. v. Martin, Tax Commissioner, et al., 1939 — 307 U.S. 615 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Nevin, Surviving Executor, et al. v. Martin, Tax Commissioner, et al.
307 U.S. 615·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Mr. Justice Butler dissents. The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice McReynolds took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 982.
Nevin, Surviving Executor, et al. v. Martin, Tax Commissioner, et al.
Decided June 5, 1939.
Mr. Justice Butler dissents. The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice McReynolds took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Mr. Alfred E. Driscoll for appellants. Mr. William A. Moore for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam,:]
Per Curiam,:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Worcester County Trust Co. v. Riley, 302 U. S. 292.