Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Perini, Correctional Superintendent v. Downey, 1975 — 423 U.S. 993 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Perini, Correctional Superintendent v. Downey
423 U.S. 993·Supreme Court of the United States·1975
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 75-219.
Perini, Correctional Superintendent v. Downey.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of appellee for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for reconsideration in light of enactment of Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2925.03, by Amended Substitute House Bill No. 300, File No. 105, ii 1, 3, effective Nov. 21, 1975. See Page’s Ohio Revised Code, 1975 Legis. Bull. No. 4, p. 261.