General
BRINDLEY v. THORNTON et al.
201 Ala. 69577 So. 999·Alabama Supreme Court·1918·AL
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(77 South. 999)
BRINDLEY v. THORNTON et al.
(7 Div. 885.)
(Supreme Court of Alabama.
Jan. 17, 1918.)
Appeal from Chancery Court,, Cherokee County; W. W. Whiteside, Chancellor.
R. B. Kelly, of Birmingham, and Goodhue & Brindley, of Gadsden, for appellant. Samuel Blackwell, of Albany, O. Kyle, of Decatur, Knox, Acker, Dixon & Sterne, of Anniston, Hugh Reed and R. F. Conner, both of Centre, W. H. Lumpkin, of Cave Springs, Ga., Boykin & Duke, of Gadsden, and S. Holderness, of Carrollton, Ga., for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Cause settled and appeal dismissed.