Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lucinda Woodard, Respondent, v. William J. Foster, Appellant, 1893 — 138 N.Y. 674 · caselaw · US
General
Lucinda Woodard, Respondent, v. William J. Foster, Appellant
138 N.Y. 674·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lucinda Woodard, Respondent, v. William J. Foster, Appellant.
(Submitted June 15, 1893;
decided June 30, 1893.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, made May 13, 1892, which reversed a judgment in favor of defendant, entered upon the report of a referee, and granted a new trial.
Geo. B. Jones for appellant.
Jerome Squires for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm and for judgment absolute for plaintiff on stipulation on opinion of General Term.
All concur.
Order affirmed.