Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Fayette W. Pierce et al., Appellants, v. Paul S. Brown et al., Respondents, 1877 — 68 N.Y. 622 · caselaw · US
General
Fayette W. Pierce et al., Appellants, v. Paul S. Brown et al., Respondents
68 N.Y. 622·New York Court of Appeals·1877·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Fayette W. Pierce et al., Appellants, v. Paul S. Brown et al., Respondents.
(Argued January 24, 1877;
decided February 6, 1877.)
Decided upon the facts in the case.
Win. R. Baldwin, for the appellants.
La Ray S. Gove for the respondents.
[MAJORITY — Miller, J.,]
Miller, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.