Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George F. Harding, Appellant, v. John S. Hart et al., 1902 — 187 U.S. 638 · caselaw · US
General
George F. Harding, Appellant, v. John S. Hart et al.
187 U.S. 638·Supreme Court of the United States·1902
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 374.
George F. Harding, Appellant, v. John S. Hart et al.
Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
Motion to dismiss.
Submitted December 1, 1902.
Decided December 15, 1902.
Mr. A. A. Hoeh-ling, Jr., for the appellant. Mr. Frederic TJliman and Mr. D. J. Schuyler for the appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction on the authority of Huguley Manufacturing Company v. Galeton Cotton Mills, 184 U. S. 290, 294, and cases cited; Rouse v. Letcher, 156 U. S. 47, and see Harding v. Hart, 186 U. S. 483.