Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Erastus F. Root, as Sole Overseer of the Poor, etc., Appellant, on the Relation of Arthur C. Fisher et al., Respondents, v. Albert J. Alexander, Respondent, 1894 — 142 N.Y. 663 · caselaw · US
General
Erastus F. Root, as Sole Overseer of the Poor, etc., Appellant, on the Relation of Arthur C. Fisher et al., Respondents, v. Albert J. Alexander, Respondent
142 N.Y. 663·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Erastus F. Root, as Sole Overseer of the Poor, etc., Appellant, on the Relation of Arthur C. Fisher et al., Respondents, v. Albert J. Alexander, Respondent.
(Argued April 17, 1894;
decided May 1,1894.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, made March 29, 1893, which reversed an order of Special Term granting a motion to dismiss the complaint.
Chcurles II. Brown for appellant.
W. Martin Jones for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur, except Earl and O’Brien, JJ., not voting. Order affirmed.