Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of Rollin Tracy, an Attorney, Appellant, 1896 — 149 N.Y. 608 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of Rollin Tracy, an Attorney, Appellant
149 N.Y. 608·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Rollin Tracy, an Attorney, Appellant.
Matter of Tracy 1 App. Div 113, affirmed.
(Submitted May 25, 1896,
decided June 16, 1896.)
Appeal from order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in tiie first judicial department, made January 30,1896, which affirmed an order of the Special Term requiring the appellant to pay over moneys collected by him.
Charles Duane Baker for appellant.
William H. Sage for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
All concur.