Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James Johnston, Respondent, v. Chester Catlin, Appellant, 1874 — 57 N.Y. 652 · caselaw · US
Tax
James Johnston, Respondent, v. Chester Catlin, Appellant
57 N.Y. 652·New York Commission of Appeals·1874·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James Johnston, Respondent, v. Chester Catlin, Appellant.
(Argued January 8, 1874;
decided May term, 1874.)
Where, in an action to recover unliquidated damages, defendant serves an offer of judgment under section 385 of the Code, in determining whether the judgment obtained is more favorable than that offered, interest cannot be added to the sum offered. Defendant cannot, by offering a sum less than plaintiff is entitled to, and then by persisting in his defense ■ and postponing a recovery until that sum, with the interest added to it, exceeds the recovery, obtain the benefits of that section as to costs.
This was an action to recover for services rendered. Defendant, before trial,, served an offer to let judgment be ■ entered for §105, which was not accepted. ■ The case was tried by a referee, who, six months less one day after the offer, reported in favor of plaintiff for $106 damages, he considering the same as unliquidated.
Plaintiff’s costs were taxed as if no offer had been made. On motion, at Special Term, costs were ordered to be readjusted, disallowing costs to plaintiff and allowing costs to defendant accruing after the offer. This order was reversed at General Term. Held, as above. (See Pike v. Johnson, 47 N. Y., 1.)
E. M. Holbrook for the appellant.
B. Vary for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Gray, C.,]
Gray, C.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Order affirmed.