Criminal Law · MBE-tested
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jose Lopez, Also Known as Angel Lopez, Appellant
207 A.D.2d 1017617 N.Y.S.2d 73·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1994·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Lopez, Also Known as Angel Lopez, Appellant.
[617 NYS2d 73]
[MAJORITY]
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention that the jury verdict convicting defendant of petit larceny is not supported by legally sufficient evidence. Defendant observed the perpetrator committing a larceny and assisted him in completing it (see, People v Robin son, 60 NY2d 982, 984). The jury could reasonably infer that, by reason of his conduct, defendant had the requisite intent to commit a larceny (see, People v Farmer, 156 AD2d 1003, 1004, lv denied 75 NY2d 868). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mark, J.—Petit Larceny.) Present— Pine, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Davis and Boehm, JJ.