Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Elizabeth Phillips, Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The Troy and Boston Railroad Company, Appellant, 1888 — 111 N.Y. 685 · caselaw · US
General
Elizabeth Phillips, Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The Troy and Boston Railroad Company, Appellant
111 N.Y. 685·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Elizabeth Phillips, Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The Troy and Boston Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued December 3, 1888;
decided December 11, 1888.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made November 30,1886, which affirmed a judgment entered upon a verdict in favor of plaintiff.
Edgar L. Fursman for appellant..
E. Oountrymcm for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.