Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Pittsburgh Railways Co. v. Amalgamated Association of Street, Electric Railway and Motor Coach Employees of America, Division 85, 1958 — 358 U.S. 882 · caselaw · US
General
Pittsburgh Railways Co. v. Amalgamated Association of Street, Electric Railway and Motor Coach Employees of America, Division 85
358 U.S. 882·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 395.
Pittsburgh Railways Co. v. Amalgamated Association of Street, Electric Railway and Motor Coach Employees of America, Division 85.
Charles Monroe Thorp, Jr. for petitioner. I. J. Gromfine, Bernard Cushman, Herman Sternstein and Frank R. Bolte for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District. Cer-tiorari denied.