Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People ex rel. William H. Howes, Respondent, v. Thomas F. Grady, Police Justice, etc., Appellant, 1895 — 144 N.Y. 685 · caselaw · US
General
The People ex rel. William H. Howes, Respondent, v. Thomas F. Grady, Police Justice, etc., Appellant
144 N.Y. 685·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People ex rel. William H. Howes, Respondent, v. Thomas F. Grady, Police Justice, etc., Appellant.
(Argued December 19, 1894;
decided January 15, 1895.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made December 16, 1892, which reversed an order of Special Term denying an application for a writ of mandamus.
Thomas F. Qrady for appellant.
Stephen B. Brague for respondent.
Reported below, 66 Hun, 465.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Order affirmed.