Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lawlor et al., trading as Independent Poster Exchange, v. National Screen Service Corp. et al., 1954 — 348 U.S. 810 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Lawlor et al., trading as Independent Poster Exchange, v. National Screen Service Corp. et al.
348 U.S. 810·Supreme Court of the United States·1954
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 163.
Lawlor et al., trading as Independent Poster Exchange, v. National Screen Service Corp. et al.
Louis Nizer for the National Screen Service Corporation, Wm. A. Schnader and Earl G. Harrison for Columbia Pictures Corporation, and Louis J. Gofjman for Warner Bros.
Pictures Distributing Corporation, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted. Francis Anderson for petitioners.