General

In the Matter of HARUYE SUZUKI on Habeas Corpus. Walter E. CARR, Director of Immigration, v. HARUYE SUZUKI

45 F.2d 1013·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1931

Before RUDKIN and WILBUR, Circuit Judges, and NORCRO'SS, District Judge.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

In the Matter of HARUYE SUZUKI on Habeas Corpus. Walter E. CARR, Director of Immigration, v. HARUYE SUZUKI. No. 6119. Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Jan. 5, 1931. Samuel W. MeNabb, U. S. Atty., and William R. Gallagher, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Los Angeles, Cal. (Harry B. Blee, U. S. Immigration Service, of Los Angeles, Cal., on the brief), for appellant. J. Edward Keating and Theodore E. Bowen, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee. Before RUDKIN and WILBUR, Circuit Judges, and NORCRO'SS, District Judge. [MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.] PER CURIAM. The pertinent facts of this ease are staled in the opinion of Judge James, reported in 36 F. (2d) 424. The law applicable to the' facts was correctly applied by the court below as construed by this court in Shizuko Kumanomido v. Nagle, 40 F.(2d) 42. Offer affirmed.