Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Federal Trade Commission v. Cement Institute et al.; Federal Trade Commission v. Aetna Portland Cement Co. et al.; Federal Trade Commission v. Marquette Cement Manufacturing Co.; Federal Trade Commission v. Calaveras Cement Co. et al.; Federal Trade Commission v. Huron Portland Cement Co.; Federal Trade Commission v. Superior Portland Cement, Inc.; Federal Trade Commission v. Northwestern Portland Cement Co.; Federal Trade Commission v. Riverside Cement Co.; Federal Trade Commission v. Universal Atlas Cement Co.; Federal Trade Commission v. California Portland Cement Co.; Federal Trade Commission v. Monolith Portland Cement Co. et al.; and Federal Trade Commission v. Smith et al., 1947 — 330 U.S. 815 · caselaw · US
General
Federal Trade Commission v. Cement Institute et al.; Federal Trade Commission v. Aetna Portland Cement Co. et al.; Federal Trade Commission v. Marquette Cement Manufacturing Co.; Federal Trade Commission v. Calaveras Cement Co. et al.; Federal Trade Commission v. Huron Portland Cement Co.; Federal Trade Commission v. Superior Portland Cement, Inc.; Federal Trade Commission v. Northwestern Portland Cement Co.; Federal Trade Commission v. Riverside Cement Co.; Federal Trade Commission v. Universal Atlas Cement Co.; Federal Trade Commission v. California Portland Cement Co.; Federal Trade Commission v. Monolith Portland Cement Co. et al.; and Federal Trade Commission v. Smith et al.
330 U.S. 815·Supreme Court of the United States·1947
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 922.
Federal Trade Commission v. Cement Institute et al.; Federal Trade Commission v. Aetna Portland Cement Co. et al.; Federal Trade Commission v. Marquette Cement Manufacturing Co.; Federal Trade Commission v. Calaveras Cement Co. et al.; Federal Trade Commission v. Huron Portland Cement Co.; Federal Trade Commission v. Superior Portland Cement, Inc.; Federal Trade Commission v. Northwestern Portland Cement Co.; Federal Trade Commission v. Riverside Cement Co.; Federal Trade Commission v. Universal Atlas Cement Co.; Federal Trade Commission v. California Portland Cement Co.; Federal Trade Commission v. Monolith Portland Cement Co. et al.; and Federal Trade Commission v. Smith et al.
No. 923.
No. 924.
No. 925.
No. 926.
No. 927.
No. 928.
No. 929.
No. 930.
No. 931.
No. 932.
No. 933.
March 10, 1947.
Acting Solicitor General Washington for petitioner. William J. Donovan, George S. Leisure, Breck P. McAllister, Nathan L. Miller, John PL. Hershberger, Herbert W. Clark, Marshall P. Madison, Edward D. Lyman and Walter C. Fox, Jr. for respondents in Nos. 922, 923, 925, 926, 930 and 933. Edward A. Zimmerman, H. W. Norman and W. R. Engelhardt for respondent in No. 924. Herbert S. Little and F. A. LeSourd for respondent in No. 927. S. Harold Shefelman for respondent in No. 928. Louis W. Myers and Pierce Works for respondent in No. 929. Robert B. Murphey and Alex W. Davis for respondent in No. 931.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit granted.