Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
BELL LINES, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al., 1970 — 397 U.S. 818 · caselaw · US
General
BELL LINES, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
397 U.S. 818·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BELL LINES, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 893.
Decided May 4, 1970
Harold Hernly, William T. Brotherton, Harry J. Jordan, Robert S. Burk, Robert R. Redmon, James E. Wilson, Edward G. Villalon, and Charles H. Ephraim for appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnane, Fritz R. Kahn, and Nahum Litt for the United States et al., and A. Alvis Layne for Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed. American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight Service, ante, p. 532.