Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lawrence HARRIS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, 1930 — 41 F.2d 999 · caselaw · US
General
Lawrence HARRIS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America
41 F.2d 999·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lawrence HARRIS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America.
No. 8786.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
May 13, 1930.
William K. Amick, of St. Joseph, Mo., and Fred W. Lewis and John J. Cosgrove, both of Kansas City, Mo., for appellant.
William L. Vandeventer, U. S. Atty., and Harry L. Thomas, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Kansas City, Mo.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution, without costs to either party in this court.