Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
David K. McCarthy et al., Appellants, v. Isaac M. Wright et al. Isaac B. Richmond, Assignee, etc., Respondent, 1891 — 125 N.Y. 723 · caselaw · US
General
David K. McCarthy et al., Appellants, v. Isaac M. Wright et al. Isaac B. Richmond, Assignee, etc., Respondent
125 N.Y. 723·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
All concur, except Earl, J., taking no part.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
David K. McCarthy et al., Appellants, v. Isaac M. Wright et al. Isaac B. Richmond, Assignee, etc., Respondent.
(Argued January 12, 1891;
decided January 27, 1891.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, made April 29, 1890, which reversed an order of Special Term directing the respondent to pay plaintiffs’ attorneys the costs of the action out of assigned property.
Louis E. Fuller for appellants.
Hadley Jones for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Earl, J., taking no part.
Order affirmed.