Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Loring Moore, Respondent, 1905 — 181 N.Y. 524 · caselaw · US
Criminal Law · MBE-tested
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Loring Moore, Respondent
181 N.Y. 524·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Loring Moore, Respondent.
People v. Moore, 96 App. Div. 56, affirmed.
(Argued March 2, 1905;
decided March 17, 1905.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered July 2, 1904, which reversed a judgment of the Saratoga County Court, rendered upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of grand larceny in the first degree and granted a new trial.
Horace K McEnighi for appellant.
Paul M. Pelletreau and George A. Clement for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order granting new trial affirmed; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Vann and Werner, JJ. Dissenting: Haight, J. *