Contracts · MBE-tested
Rufus BROYLES and Ed Lackey v. STATE
22 Ala. App. 135113 So. 623; 8 Div. 535, 536·Alabama Court of Appeals·1927·AL
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(113 So. 623)
Rufus BROYLES and Ed Lackey v. STATE
(8 Div. 535, 536.)
Court of Appeals of Alabama.
June 7, 1927.
Rehearing Denied June 21, 1927.
O. M. Raines, of Scottsboro, for appellants.
Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., and Merwin T. Koonce, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
[MAJORITY — RICE, J.]
RICE, J.
These appellants were indicted jointly with Lewis Watkins for the offense of “assault with intent to murder” one Oscar Neyman. While a severance was granted as to Lewis Watkips, and he was tried separately from the two appellants here, yet we are unable to distinguish the few questions presented to us for consideration on his appeal from those presented by this. Consequently, upon the authority of what we said in the opinion in Lewis Watkins v. State (8th Div. 542) ante, p. 134, 113 So. 622, the judgment here appealed from is affirmed.