Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Monjar v. United States; Monjar v. United States; Cook v. United States; Jones v. United States; Drew v. United States; Moore v. United States; Lindh v. United States; Fitzpatrick v. United States; Willard v. United States; Candlin v. United States; Cruser v. United States; and Maddams v. United States, 1945 — 325 U.S. 859 · caselaw · US
General
Monjar v. United States; Monjar v. United States; Cook v. United States; Jones v. United States; Drew v. United States; Moore v. United States; Lindh v. United States; Fitzpatrick v. United States; Willard v. United States; Candlin v. United States; Cruser v. United States; and Maddams v. United States
325 U.S. 859·Supreme Court of the United States·1945
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1104.
No. 1105.
No. 1106.
No. 1107.
No. 1108.
No. 1109.
No. 1110.
No. 1111.
No. 1112.
No. 1113.
No. 1114.
No. 1115.
Monjar v. United States; Monjar v. United States; Cook v. United States; Jones v. United States; Drew v. United States; Moore v. United States; Lindh v. United States; Fitzpatrick v. United States; Willard v. United States; Candlin v. United States; Cruser v. United States; and Maddams v. United States.
May 21, 1945.
Messrs. William D. Donnelly, Daniel 0. Hastings, William A. Cray and Homer Cummings for petitioners.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Assistant Solicitor General Cox, Assistant'Attorney General Tom C. Clark, Mr. Robert S. Erdahl and Miss Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Reported below: 147 F. 2d 916; No. 1110, 148 F. 2d 332.