Criminal Law · MBE-tested
Al Raino, Respondent, v. Dominick C. Valardo, Appellant; Betty McCullough, Respondent, v. Dominick C. Valardo, Appellant; Ambrose Curley, Respondent, v. Dominick C. Valardo, Appellant; William Curley, Respondent, v. Dominick C. Valardo, Appellant
228 A.D. 730·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1930·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Al Raino, Respondent, v. Dominick C. Valardo, Appellant. Betty McCullough, Respondent, v. Dominick C. Valardo, Appellant. Ambrose Curley, Respondent, v. Dominick C. Valardo, Appellant. William Curley, Respondent, v. Dominick C. Valardo, Appellant.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The summons was served April 5, 1928. There was no extension of time to serve the complaint and no attempt to serve until January 11, 1929. At that time defendant refused to accept service. On the record here to delay application for leave to serve the complaint until October 19, 1929, was inexcusable. The order should not have been granted. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Davis, Whitmyer and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur. Order reversed, on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.