Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Craig M. KOEHLER, an Individual, et al., Appellants, v. MARCONA MINING COMPANY, a Nevada Corporation, Appellee; Ismael COBIAN, Appellant, v. MARCONA MINING COMPANY, a Nevada Corporation, et al., Appellees, 1975 — 518 F.2d 696 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Craig M. KOEHLER, an Individual, et al., Appellants, v. MARCONA MINING COMPANY, a Nevada Corporation, Appellee; Ismael COBIAN, Appellant, v. MARCONA MINING COMPANY, a Nevada Corporation, et al., Appellees
518 F.2d 696·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1975
Before WRIGHT, KILKENNY and SNEED, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Craig M. KOEHLER, an Individual, et al., Appellants, v. MARCONA MINING COMPANY, a Nevada Corporation, Appellee. Ismael COBIAN, Appellant, v. MARCONA MINING COMPANY, a Nevada Corporation, et al., Appellees.
Nos. 73-3441, 74-1042.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 8, 1975.
Richard L. Noble (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.
Noble K. Gregory (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM:]
OPINION
Before WRIGHT, KILKENNY and SNEED, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
These appeals involve the construction of contracts dealing with the mining of iron ore on the Marcona Plateau, Province of Nazea, Department of lea, Republic of Peru. The district court’s development of the relevant and material facts in its opinion, Koehler v. Marcona Mining Co. and Cobian v. Marcona Mining Co., 391 F.Supp. 1158 (N.D.Cal.1973), is exceptionally comprehensive and its findings are thoroughly supported by the massive record, consisting, among other things, of fourteen volumes of testimony.
We hold that the district court accurately applied the relevant law to the facts. Accordingly, we affirm the judgments on the basis of the lower court’s decision.