Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Florida ex rel. Yoeman v. City of Sarasota; and Florida ex rel. Garland v. Same, 1940 — 309 U.S. 640 · caselaw · US
General
Florida ex rel. Yoeman v. City of Sarasota; and Florida ex rel. Garland v. Same
309 U.S. 640·Supreme Court of the United States·1940
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 845.
Florida ex rel. Yoeman v. City of Sarasota; and Florida ex rel. Garland v. Same.
No. 846.
April 22, 1940.
Messrs. Stuart B. Warren, George W. Wylie, and J. Velma Keen for appellants.
Messrs. J. J. Williams, Jr. and Francis C. Dart for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed for the reason that the judgments of the state court are based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support them. Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268, 271; Doyle v. Atwell, 261 U. S. 590; McCoy v. Shaw, 277 U. S. 302.