General
Consolidated Lighting Corp., Respondent, v. Lester E. Grossman et al., Individually and Copartners Trading under the Name of Commercial Trading Co., Appellants
285 A.D. 1142·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1955·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Consolidated Lighting Corp., Respondent, v. Lester E. Grossman et al., Individually and Copartners Trading under the Name of Commercial Trading Co., Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. The date for the examination to proceed shall be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Concur — Cohn, J. P., Callahan, Breitel, Botein and Rabin, JJ.