Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
WOOD TOWING CORPORATION, a Corporation, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. NORFOLK-BERKLEY BRIDGE CORPORATION, a Corporation, Appellee and Cross-Appellant, 1930 — 42 F.2d 1023 · caselaw · US
Corporations
WOOD TOWING CORPORATION, a Corporation, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. NORFOLK-BERKLEY BRIDGE CORPORATION, a Corporation, Appellee and Cross-Appellant
42 F.2d 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WOOD TOWING CORPORATION, a Corporation, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. NORFOLK-BERKLEY BRIDGE CORPORATION, a Corporation, Appellee and Cross-Appellant.
No. 2932.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Jan. 14, 1930.
See, also, 29 F.(2d) 115.
John W. Oast, Jr., of Norfolk, Va., for appellant and cross-appellee.
Williams, Loyall & Taylor and J. W. Willcox, all of Norfolk, Va., for appellee and cross-appellant.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Consent decree filed. Cause remanded.