General
Richard Knoop, Appellant, v. United States Tennis Association, Respondent, and Pride Equipment Corp., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Arc Electric, Inc., Third-Party Defendant. (And Another Third-Party Action.)
262 A.D.2d 456691 N.Y.S.2d 319·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1999·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Richard Knoop, Appellant, v United States Tennis Association, Respondent, and Pride Equipment Corp., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Arc Electric, Inc., Third-Party Defendant. (And Another Third-Party Action.)
[691 NYS2d 319]
[MAJORITY]
—Appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Schmidt, J.), entered April 17, 1998.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Schmidt, J., at the Supreme Court. S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.