Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
PACIFIC MIDWAY OIL COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, 1933 — 66 F.2d 1017 · caselaw · US
Corporations
PACIFIC MIDWAY OIL COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
66 F.2d 1017·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
PACIFIC MIDWAY OIL COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 6849.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 31, 1933.
Wm. Bresnahan, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
H. H. McPike, U. S. Atty., of San Francisco, Cal.
Before SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge, and ST. SURE, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon motion of counsel for appellant, ordered appeal dismissed, with prejudice; mandate forthwith.