Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bridget Cashen, Respondent, v. The City of Auburn, Impleaded, etc., Appellant, 1888 — 109 N.Y. 658 · caselaw · US
General
Bridget Cashen, Respondent, v. The City of Auburn, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
109 N.Y. 658·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Bridget Cashen, Respondent, v. The City of Auburn, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Argued April 20, 1888;
decided May 4, 1888.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made October 24, 1885, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
George Underwood for appellant.
L. E. Warren for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal on authority of Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company v. Burkard (ante, p. 648).
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.