Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of Elizabeth R. Bailey, Respondent, for a Refund of Taxes. The Board of Supervisors of Suffolk County, Appellant, 1905 — 182 N.Y. 523 · caselaw · US
Tax
In the Matter of the Application of Elizabeth R. Bailey, Respondent, for a Refund of Taxes. The Board of Supervisors of Suffolk County, Appellant
182 N.Y. 523·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Elizabeth R. Bailey, Respondent, for a Refund of Taxes. The Board of Supervisors of Suffolk County, Appellant.
(Submitted May 31, 1905;
decided June 16, 1905.)
Matter of Bailey, 102 App. Div. 624, affirmed.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department,- entered March IQ, 1905, which modified and affirmed as modified an order of the Suffolk County Court directing that a certain sum paid upon a void assessment he refunded to the petitioner.
Timothy M. Griffing for appellant.
F. H. Van Vechten for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ.