Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
CUTLER BINDERY CO., a Corporation, et al., Appellants, v. GUARDIAN BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, a Corporation, Alleged Bankrupt, and James W. Mott, Corporation Commissioner, etc., Appellees, 1932 — 60 F.2d 1083 · caselaw · US
Corporations
CUTLER BINDERY CO., a Corporation, et al., Appellants, v. GUARDIAN BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, a Corporation, Alleged Bankrupt, and James W. Mott, Corporation Commissioner, etc., Appellees
60 F.2d 1083·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CUTLER BINDERY CO., a Corporation, et al., Appellants, v. GUARDIAN BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, a Corporation, Alleged Bankrupt, and James W. Mott, Corporation Commissioner, etc., Appellees.
No. 6699.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 1, 1932.
Wm. B. Layton and N. Ray Alber, both .of Portland, Or., for appellants.
Barnett H. Goldstein and John W. Kaste, both of Portland, Or., for appellees. '
Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The appeal in this case is from an order refusing to adjudicate the Guardian Building & Loan Association a bankrupt. Motion to dismiss is granted. Home Savings & Loan Association v. Plass, 57 F.(2d) 117, decided by this court March 21, 1932.