Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Cologro PIAZZA, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee, 1932 — 59 F.2d 1071 · caselaw · US
General
Cologro PIAZZA, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee
59 F.2d 1071·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Cologro PIAZZA, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.
No. 4793.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
July 14, 1932.
Frederic M. P. Pearse, of Newark, N. J., for appellant.
Phillip Forman, U. S. Atty., and John W. Griggs, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Trenton, N. J., for appellee.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PEE CURIAM.]
PEE CURIAM.
The facts in this ease bring it clearly within the case of Miller v. United States (C. C. A.) 50 F.(2d) 505. Finding no error, the judgment below is affirmed.