Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
WESTERN LOAN & SAVINGS COMPANY v. COLORADO SMELTING & MINING COMPANY, 1908 — 212 U.S. 556 · caselaw · US
General
WESTERN LOAN & SAVINGS COMPANY v. COLORADO SMELTING & MINING COMPANY
212 U.S. 556·Supreme Court of the United States·1908
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WESTERN LOAN & SAVINGS COMPANY v. COLORADO SMELTING & MINING COMPANY.
WRIT OP ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP MONTANA.
No. 581.
Submitted November 9, 1908.
Decided November 16, 1908.
Western Loan Co. v. Butte & Bostpn Mining Co., 210 U. S. 368, followed.
Mr. John A. Shelton, for plaintiff in error.
No appearance for defendant in ¿rror.
The points involved in this case, as stated in the headnote of Western Loan Co. v. Butte & Boston Mining Co., are as follows:
“Where diversity of citizenship exists so that the suit is cognizable in some Circuit Court the objection to the jurisdiction of the particular court in which'the suit is brought may be waived by appearing and pleading to the merits. In re Moore, 209 U. S. 490, overruling anything to the contrary in Ex parte Wisner, 203 U. S. 449.
“In a State where objection that the court has not jurisdiction of the person must — as in Montana under Code, § 1820 — be taken by special appearance and motion aimed at the jurisdiction, the interposition by defendant of a demurrer going to the merits as well as to the jurisdiction amounts to a waiver of the objection that the particular Circuit Court in which he is sued -is without jurisdiction.”
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
Judgment reversed with costs, and cause remanded on authority of Western Loan & Savings Co. v. The Butte & Boston Consolidated Mining Co., 210 U. S. 368.