General
In the Matter of Joseph Keenan, Appellant, against Walter B. Martin et al., Constituting the Prison Board at Clinton Prison, Respondents
265 A.D. 981·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1942·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Joseph Keenan, Appellant, against Walter B. Martin et al., Constituting the Prison Board at Clinton Prison, Respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Crapser, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., concurs solely upon the ground that mandamus may not be resorted to in matters of this kind. The petitioner is entitled to a total of seventeen and one-half days per month as compensation and commutation. (People ex rel. Hammond v. Martin, 261 App. Div. 648.) [See post, p. 1029.]