Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The City of Montgomery, Plaintiff in Error, v. R. H. Greene et al.; The City of Montgomery, Plaintiff in Error, v. W. R. McDade et al., 1916 — 242 U.S. 613 · caselaw · US
General
The City of Montgomery, Plaintiff in Error, v. R. H. Greene et al.; The City of Montgomery, Plaintiff in Error, v. W. R. McDade et al.
242 U.S. 613·Supreme Court of the United States·1916
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 41.
The City of Montgomery, Plaintiff in Error, v. R. H. Greene et al.; The City of Montgomery, Plaintiff in Error, v. W. R. McDade et al.
and No. 42.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Alabama.
Argued for plaintiff in error October 27, 1916.
Decided October 30, 1916.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consol. Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. 652, 658; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469, 471-472; (2) Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14, 16; County of Sioux v. Newton Rule, 241 U. S. 640. Mr. W. A. Gunter for the plaintiff in error. No appearance for the defendants in error.