Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Brautigam, Administratrix, 1962 — 369 U.S. 821 · caselaw · US
General
Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Brautigam, Administratrix
369 U.S. 821·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 681.
Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Brautigam, Administratrix.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Elisha Hanson, John C. Thompson, Arthur B. Hanson, Calvin H. Cobb, Jr., Emmett E. Tucker, Jr., Hervey Yancey and L. S. Bonsteel for petitioner.
Paul A. Louis and Melvin M. Belli for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third Appellate District. Certiorari denied.