Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jacob Randolph, Respondent, v. Cornelius J. Bergen et al., Appellants, 1882 — 89 N.Y. 607 · caselaw · US
General
Jacob Randolph, Respondent, v. Cornelius J. Bergen et al., Appellants
89 N.Y. 607·New York Court of Appeals·1882·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jacob Randolph, Respondent, v. Cornelius J. Bergen et al., Appellants
(Submitted April 25, 1882;
decided May 5, 1882.)
This action was brought by a judgment creditor to set aside a transfer of real estate as fraudulent. The Special Term found, upon evidence deemed by the court here fully sufficient that the transfer was fraudulent in fact.
A. & J. Z. Lott for appellants.
Wm. J. Qaynor for respondent.
Finch, J., reads for affirmance.
[MAJORITY]
All concur, except Tract, J., taking no part, and Miller, J., absent.
Judgment affirmed.