General
UNITED WRAPPING MACH. CO. v. STIMSON
175 F. 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1910
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED WRAPPING MACH. CO. v. STIMSON.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
February 8, 1910.)
In Error to tbe Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of New York. Application of the United Wrapping Machine Company for a writ of mandamus against Henry C. Stimson.
Petition for mandamus denied, and writ of error dismissed.
See, also, 156 Fed. 298.
Before LA COMBE, WARD, and NOYES, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
We do not find in the papers submitted sufficient to indicate that this is a case presenting the “very extraordinary circumstances,” which have occasionally induced a modification of the rule that a bill of exceptions cannot be signed after expiration of the term at which the cause was tried, when the court has not reserved control over the case by rule or order. Reader v. Haggin (2d Circuit. March, 1908) 160 Fed. 909, 88 C. C. A. 91. The petition for mandamus is denied, and writ of error dismissed.