Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Samuel Burges, Respondent, v. Henry H. Jackson et al., Composing the Firm of Peter A. H. Jackson's Sons, Appellants, 1900 — 162 N.Y. 632 · caselaw · US
General
Samuel Burges, Respondent, v. Henry H. Jackson et al., Composing the Firm of Peter A. H. Jackson's Sons, Appellants
162 N.Y. 632·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Yann and Werner, JJ. Not sitting: Cullen, J.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Samuel Burges, Respondent, v. Henry H. Jackson et al., Composing the Firm of Peter A. H. Jackson’s Sons, Appellants.
Burges v. Jackson, 18 App. Div. 296, affirmed.
(Argued March 14, 1900;
decided April 3, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment and order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered, respectively, June 21 and June 15, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court.
Edward W. S. Johnston for appellants.
Charles A. Webber for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Yann and Werner, JJ. Not sitting: Cullen, J.