General
Arthur Goossen, an Infant, by Alice Goossen, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Charles S. Codington, Respondent
145 A.D. 906·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1911·NY
All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented upon the opinion of the special county judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Arthur Goossen, an Infant, by Alice Goossen, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Charles S. Codington, Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment of County Court reversed and judgment of Municipal Court affirmed, with costs in this court and County Court to appellant.
All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented upon the opinion of the special county judge.