General
RIVERSIDE & FT. LEE FERRY COMPANY, Libelant-Appellant, v. Steamship DE WITT CLINTON; Hudson River Day Line, Claimant-Appellee
22 F.2d 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1927
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
RIVERSIDE & FT. LEE FERRY COMPANY, Libelant-Appellant, v. Steamship DE WITT CLINTON; Hudson River Day Line, Claimant-Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
December 5, 1927.
No. 92.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Bigham, Englar & Jones, of New York City (Leonard J. Matteson and Richard F. Shaw, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Kirlin, Woolsey, Campbell, Hickox & Keating, of New York City (J. Harvey Turnure and W. H. McGrann, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee and the De Witt Clinton.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed, with costs.