Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Price v. Pitchess, Sheriff; Cargile et al. v. Michigan; Howie v. United States Rubber Co., Inc., et al.; Timmons v. McGrath; Morris v. United States; Bottos v. Avakian et al.; White v. United States; House v. Stynchcombe, Sheriff, et al.; Gibson v. United States; Townes v. United States; McCorquodale v. Stynchcombe, Sheriff, et al.; Murphy v. Fatzer, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Kansas, et al.; Robinson v. Indiana; Poston v. South Carolina; Galbraith v. City of Columbus, Ohio; Fairchild v. Municipal Court of California, Imperial County, Imperial Judicial District, 1978 — 434 U.S. 1041 · caselaw · US