General
Sarah A. McCluskey, Respondent, v. The National Life Association of Hartford, Conn., Appellant
149 N.Y. 616·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sarah A. McCluskey, Respondent, v. The National Life Association of Hartford, Conn., Appellant.
McCluskey v. National L. Assn., 77 Hun, 556, affirmed.
(Argued June 3, 1896;
decided June 19, 1896.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made February 13, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Circuit without a jury.
E. T. Lovatt for appellant.
O. A. Dennis for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.