General
W. A. BELL, Administrator, Appellant, v. NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE OF SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS, Appellee
129 S.W.2d 1215·Texas Courts of Civil Appeals·1939·TX
Brief incoming
Source-anchored Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
W. A. BELL, Administrator, Appellant, v. NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE OF SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS, Appellee.
No. 10603.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.
June 14, 1939.
Leroy C. Mumme, of Kenedy, for appellant.
Beasley & Beasley, of Beeville, and R. L. Ball, of San Antonio, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — SMITH, Chief Justice.]
SMITH, Chief Justice.
In this case neither party has filed briefs, but appellee has filed motion that judgment be affirmed.
In the absence of briefs, this Court may, in its discretion, dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, or go into the record to determine if fundamental error lurks therein, and, if not, to affirm; but if error is apparent, to reverse. Haynes v. J. M. Radford Grocery Co., 118 Tex. 277, 14 S.W.2d 811.
We have inspected the record and perceive no error.
The motion is granted and the judgment will be affirmed.