Criminal Law · MBE-tested
WONG LUNG, Appellant, v. STATE, Respondent
33 Ariz. 431265 Pac. 625·Arizona Supreme Court·1928·AZ
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Criminal No. 669.
Filed March 19, 1928.]
[265 Pac. 625.]
WONG LUNG, Appellant, v. STATE, Respondent.
Mr. L. L. Wallace and Messrs. Struckmeyer, Jennings & Strouss, for Appellant.
Mr. John W. Murphy, Attorney General, Mr. Frank J.- Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. J. Hubert Smith, County Attorney (Mr. W. E. Patterson and Mr. J. J. Sweeney, of Counsel), for the State.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
— The appeal in this case is on all-fours, so far as the facts, the assignments of error and the law are concerned, with that of Sam v. State, No. 670, ante, p. 421, 265 Pac. 622. For the reasons stated therein, the order of the superior court of Mohave county in this case is affirmed.