Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John D. Hossack, Respondent, v. Thorwald Heyerdahl et al., Appellants, 1875 — 60 N.Y. 634 · caselaw · US
General
John D. Hossack, Respondent, v. Thorwald Heyerdahl et al., Appellants
60 N.Y. 634·New York Court of Appeals·1875·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John D. Hossack, Respondent, v. Thorwald Heyerdahl et al., Appellants.
(Argued February 23, 1875 ;
decided February 26, 1875.)
This was an appeal from an order of reference, granted on plaintiff’s motion, on the ground that the trial required the examination of a long account.
Samuel Hand for the appellants.
George W. Miller for the respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal. No opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.