Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John G. Carlisle, Respondent, v. Reon Barnes, Appellant, 1906 — 183 N.Y. 567 · caselaw · US
General
John G. Carlisle, Respondent, v. Reon Barnes, Appellant
183 N.Y. 567·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John G. Carlisle, Respondent, v. Reon Barnes, Appellant.
(Argued January 8, 1906;
decided January 16, 1906.)
Carlisle v. Barnes, 103 App. Div. 573, appeal dismissed.
Motion to dismiss appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 7, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
The motion was made upon the ground that the appeal had been taken pursuant to an order of a judge of the Court of Appeals granting permission to appeal and that said order had been thereafter vacated by the court.
Henry M. Ward for motion.
F. H. Van Vechten opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed.