Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Cora Chester Tripp, Respondent, v. George T. Chester, Individually, and as Executor of Mary P. Chester, Deceased, Appellant, Impleaded with Others, 1903 — 176 N.Y. 575 · caselaw · US
General
Cora Chester Tripp, Respondent, v. George T. Chester, Individually, and as Executor of Mary P. Chester, Deceased, Appellant, Impleaded with Others
176 N.Y. 575·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Cora Chester Tripp, Respondent, v. George T. Chester, Individually, and as Executor of Mary P. Chester, Deceased, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
Tripp v. Chester, 66 App. Div. 623, affirmed.
(Argued October 13, 1903;
decided October 30, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment, entered June 3, 1902, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the. fourth judicial department, affirming an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court, on trial at an Equity Term.
Frank C. Ferguson for appellant.
Adelbert Moot for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vann, JJ.